Connecting with Patry Francis

My three-year-old daughter smells like soap and toothpaste as she crawls into bed next to me. It’s ten o’clock at night and I’ve just returned from the Intensive Care Unit where I kissed my husband goodnight on the forehead. My daughter knows daddy is sick, but in her mind he’s suffering from the flu.

It’s not the flu, though. It’s a rare but reoccurring blood disease. So rare, in fact, it has yet to be diagnosed.

In 1982, his father walked for miles—from an apartment in Havanah to the church of Saint Lazaro in the Cuban countryside. He went there to pray for his two-year-old son, who was dying from a mysterious blood disease. He would make the trip again two years later, when my husband was only four, and again at six. During each episode, doctors would begin a barrage of tests, ruling out one disease after another. Every member of the extended family went in for genetic testing. Still, his condition remained unexplained

This is his sixth stay in the hospital. His symptoms are not as severe as when he was a child, but his condition is still critical. But through it all, we are grateful. This rare blood condition is very similar to so many others, other diseases that are fatal, diseases that create lethal toxins and destroy organs. Yet, my husband continues to recover.

He also hopes doctors will be able to discover something new during this episode, something that may help others with the same condition. Perhaps they can learn something about how his body manages to self correct, why this disease goes into complete remission. Perhaps it could lead to a cure for similar diseases that are fatal.

Facing mortality can be frightening, but it can also be liberating. It reminds you what’s truly important. You also learn the importance of community, as you are forced to rely on others for help. It is in this spirit that I send out my prayers to a fellow writer Patry Francis. Patry Francis is the author of Liar’s Diary, a colorful murder mystery that has filled in the drab hours of waiting in uncomfortable hospital chairs. Patry is facing her own medical ordeal right now, diagnosed with an aggressive cancer just a few weeks before Liar’s Diary was due for its paper back release. In her blog Simply Wait, there is a glimmer of the awe and insight that mortal awareness brings. I hope her recovery is successful, and in the spirit of community I extend my support, for her health and her creative vision.

I will continue to carry my copy of Liar’s Diary with me, and as soon as I finish it, I will post again with a detailed review. But now I must get some sleep, an hour has slipped by since I started this post and my snuggly bundle of soap scented love has just fallen into a deep sleep.

Book Review: Dr. Gott’s No Flour, No Sugar Cookbook

Dr. Gott’s No Flour, No Sugar CookbookSo how are those New Year’s resolutions coming along? Yeah I know. While some of us are struggling along, others have already given up. We always start with the best intentions, but well, then reality sets in and we fall right back into old habits.

Did you resolve to eat healthy or loose weight? Well if you did, I have a great book for you: Dr. Gott’s No Flour, No Sugar Cookbook. Honestly, I can’t speak for the diet itself (featured in his New York Times bestselling book Dr. Gott’s No Flour, No Sugar Diet), but I can say I love the cookbook.

As a mom who is always looking for ways to reduce the sugar intake of my family (we have a history of diabetes in the family), I jumped at the opportunity to try Dr. Gott’s new cookbook.

In Part I, Dr. Gott takes a moment to clarify the difference between simple and complex carbohydrates as well as some of the myths surrounding artificial sweeteners. The goal of the No Flour, No Sugar diet is eliminating the two biggest sources of empty calories—white flour and refined sugar. Part II contains over 200 recipes, with categories that included: Breakfast, Snacks, Appetizers, Soups, Salads, Wraps, Entrées, Side Dishes, and Desserts.

I was a little skeptical of the recipes at first, especially when I read the Banana Muffin recipe. Can you imagine? Dr. Gott proposes a Banana Muffin with absolutely no flour and no sugar. Made with egg whites, apple sauce, bananas, and oatmeal and a few other ingredients, the recipe conjured images of a heavy granola bar rather than a fluffy muffin. Let me tell you, I was pleasantly surprised with my first half batch. (I admit, I was too skeptical to even commit to an even dozen). The Banana Muffins are sweet and moist and certainly cater to my morning pastry craving.

After such a successful trial run, I was excited about the rest of the recipes, none of which have disappointed. One of my favorites—No Flour, No Sugar Pizza! With a crust made of cooked rice, eggs, and shredded cheese, it may sound like a soggy alternative, but that is far from the truth. This pizza rivals the gourmet thin crust pizza I’ve eaten in New York. Even my husband and picky three-year-old love it!

Although Dr. Gott does caution diabetics to follow their doctor’s nutritional advice, my mother (a diabetic herself) was my co-taster throughout my review and is so thrilled with the results she’ll be purchasing her own copy of the cookbook.

Dr. Grott’s No Flour, No Sugar Cookbook not only serves as an excellent complement to his already popular diet plan, it’s also an excellent resource for those of us who are trying to reduce their consumption of processed foods—like refined sugar.

Book Review: How Not to Look Old

Krupp, Charla. How Not to Look Old. Sprinboard Press.  232 p. ISBN: 0446581143 (ISBN-13: 9780446581141) $25.99

How Not to Look OldI admit, I’m part of that aging generation x. Like most moms, I often choose comfort over style, and my muscle tone resembles the firmness of an over ripe banana. Fortunately, many of the determined ladies of the baby boom generation are not buying into the “growing old gracefully” mantra, leading the charge on the new ‘how old is she?!’ revolution. Take a look at the red carpet and you’ll see how many women still manage to look young and hip into their forties and fifties. Of course, you may be thinking, with an expensive stylist—I could look fabulous, too. You’re right. We can all look fabulous. If you can’t afford that expensive stylist, try picking up a copy of How Not to look Old, by Charla Krupp.

Ok, some of you might think it odd that I, of all people, would endorse a book that focuses on the superficial. In an ideal world, image would not be an issue. But let’s face it, we don’t. As author, Charla Krupp points out, “Studies on attractiveness have shown that people who are better-looking, younger, and slimmer are more likely to get a job and keep it—as well as win friends and influence people.” Looking your best also affects your self-confidence, and ultimately your performance.

Charla Krupp is the former beauty director at Glamour, senior editor at Instyle, and beauty editor at People: Style Watch. Along with her current fashion column in More magazine, Krupp regularly appears on style segments for the Today show.

In How Not to Look Old, she dishes on industry secrets for looking young and hip at any age, from forty to sixty. The subtitle reads: Fast and Effortless Ways to Look 10 Years Younger, 10 Pounds Lighter, 10 Times Better, and pretty much spells out the objective. With nineteen chapters covering hair, makeup, skin, teeth, nails, wardrobe and accessories, information is organized in an easy to find format, with plenty of bullet points and photos.

Each chapter also has a section called ‘Brilliant Buys,’ listing effective products from various price ranges. Krupp doesn’t subscribe to the price equals quality formula. Krupp has personally tested each product and recommends a few that give you the biggest bang for your buck.

Don’t have time to make a huge commitment to your personal image? Fear not. Krupp has designed her book with high, medium, and low maintenance options. A quick quiz will tell you what level of investment is right for you. Yes, I used the word investment, because that’s what it is—an investment that pays of in self-esteem and first impressions.

We all have an image, one that is either consciously put together or one that we allow to develop by default. If you want to create an image that allows your inner youth and vitality to manifest on the outside, you’ll love How Not to Look Old. Krupp delivers her advice in a straight forward ‘girl, I’m going to give you the truth’ sort of way. She’s very frank about why baby boomers (and aging gen x-ers like me!) can’t afford to let themselves go: “For our generation, looking younger isn’t just about vanity . . . Looking good is about our personal and financial survival.”

If you want to age fabulously instead of gracefully, I highly recommend Charla Krupp’s new book. It’s one of the best was to make a proactive transition from your trendy twenties to young and hip thirties, forties, and fifties.

From ‘Sex in the City’ to ‘Cashmere Mafia’: The Chic Shift to Mommy Lit

Cashmere MafiaDon’t worry folks, this is not another review of ABC’s latest premier. I think the traditional media already has that covered with reviews ranging from Ooo-la-la to ho-hum to eee-gads. (See reviews by Tom Jicha in the South Florida Sun-Sentinel, Robert Bianco in USA Today, and Brian Lowry in Variety.) No, Cashmere Mafia isn’t really winning any critical acclaim. Like the upcoming Lipstick Jungle, this one hour dramedy seeks to fill the viewer void created by the wrap up of Sex and the City. But while most of the critics are busy analyzing the what, I can’t help but consider the why. Why would ABC invest in a SATC knock off and why are some women eager to defend it?

In September, ABC premiered the new series Big Shots, a dramedy following the friendship of four high power men and their woes with women. Labeling it the boys club revamp of Desperate Housewives, TV Critic Linda Stasi notes: “Interesting that when the suits at ABC think women they think desperation, and when they think men they think power.” Clearly Cashmere Mafia, counters that criticism. The women of Cashmere Mafia are crashing through the glass ceiling while attempting to manage their personal lives.

Much of the negative criticism surrounding the show is do to its obvious similarities to Darren Star’s other series about fashionable, confident women—Sex and the City. Although, Cashmere Mafia may use the same stylebook developed for that ubber successful HBO series, I do see one significant plot difference. Two of the power divas are married moms, an idea SATC flirted with developing Charlotte’s dream of the fairy tale marriage and complicating it with fertility issues and later with Miranda’s unexpected pregnancy that pushed her into the realm of working moms.

In Cashmere Mafia, both Zoe Burden and Juliet Draper are married with children, and both are struggling to balance work and family with varying levels of success. The transition from the all single cast of SATC to the partially married cast of Cashmere Mafia marks the shift in the working woman’s life style.

In a recent Modern Matriarch interview, writer Laura Zigman discussed a similar phenomenon within the publishing industry—the transition from ‘chic lit’ to ‘mommy lit’:

“When I was writing Animal Husbandry, chick lit didn’t exist. It happened afterwards, when my book and a bunch of other books proved that a collective consciousness exists and at the time that collective consciousness was focused on single women who were trying to figure out their lives. “Mommy Lit’ is sort of an extension of this: the same single women who are now married with children are still trying to figure out their lives.”

ABC obviously recognizes this shift as well. Ok, so Cashmere Mafia is over the top. That’s the ABC dramedy formula. Consider shows like Big Shots, Brothers and Sisters, Dirty Sexy Money, Private Practice and of course Grey’s Anatomy. What is interesting is the way ABC is tracking it’s demographic and how they represent women and our current concerns. I find it particularly telling that both Cashmere Mafia and Big Shots depict conflict between work and family obligations with the invasion of children into the workplace and the stigma of placing a priority on family.

In the pilot of Big Shots, one of the CEOs gripes “Men are the new women.” Well, at least that’s true for the cheeky chic ‘man’ series that’s adopted the mommy lit format. It will be interesting to see how this all plays out—what will strike a cord with women who enjoy the incorporation of both identifiable character types and outrageous escapism. Let’s face it after a long day of balancing work and family, women don’t want more reality, they want a break. They want to laugh or achieve some cathartic release through a good revenge plot, hence the tacky title Cashmere Mafia and ABC’s eagerness to back it.

Although many critics use terms like ‘mommy lit’ and ‘momprenuers’ in the pejorative, I think it’s more detrimental to men than to women. After all, if men buy into that softened female identity, they maybe underestimating a growing social network—the new ‘girls club’.

Author Interview: Laura Zigman

Yesterday, I posted a review of a very humorous book, Piece of Work, by Laura Zigman. Despite the hectic holidays, Ms. Zigman was kind enough to answer some interview question for us, and I will be posted them here for you today. You might want to grab a cup of coffee for a relatable heart to heart conversion with this one time publicist turned author.

As I mentioned in my review, your characters are so authentic, it was like reading about my own life. What is your technique for creating believable characters?

I’m embarrassed to admit that my “technique” is drawing from my own experiences or those of close friends. In the case of dealing with a spouse who’d lost his job, I had several friends who’d gone through this – husbands who had lost their jobs which required a whole change in the division of family labor – so I felt like I had some idea of what that would be like. Since I’ve been lucky enough to work at home since my son was born, the feelings I ascribed to Julia about going back to work and having to leave her son behind were my own: I would have been very sad to have had to do that. As for Mary Ford, the beast of a has-been – well, she was real, too. Based on a mixture of celebrity authors I traveled with when I was a publicist for Random House 15 years ago.

In Piece of Work, Julia Einstein really has her hands full with a difficult client. As a publishing industry insider, I’m sure you’ve seen your share of difficult personalities. What are some of the most outrageous demands you’ve heard writer’s make? What’s your best advice for writers who want to develop positive relationships with their agents, editors and book publicists?

You know, the worst demands were made by Hollywood celebrities who occasionally crossed over into book publishing: those celebrities who had written (or who had paid someone to write) their memoirs. Hollywood demands make publishing demands look ridiculously small, since the scope of everything in the movie business – money, fame, power – dwarfs everything else. Most of the time those celebrity memoirs were written by has-beens – people whose careers had waned slightly or significantly – and because of the ebb in their fame they come into the publication of their book already insecure and feeling entitled. They want to be pampered, catered to, treated like a star, and their demands are ridiculous. Everyone has a right to have preferences – certain pens, certain food and drink – but the level of accommodation becomes insane when you are forced to drive around Cincinnati for two hours looking for a particular brand of water. Even non-Hollywood authors made outrageous demands – everyone wants their 15 minutes. And when you’re the publicist that 15 minutes can seem like a lifetime.

 The best advice for any author is to treat everyone they come in contact with politely. This probably seems ridiculous to actually articulate – it’s common sense, right? – but you’d be surprised how many authors are rude and petulant and extremely unpleasant to deal with. If you want your publicist or your agent or your publisher to listen to you and do as much to promote you and your book as they possibly can, you have to be nice. That means saying please and thank you. A lot. Which really isn’t that hard.

In previous interviews you explained that your first book (Animal Husbandry) took five years to write do to the demands of a full-time job, while you wrote your second book (Dating Big Bird) over the course of three months in a rented beach house. What is writing like now that you’re a mom?

It’s funny. When I was writing Animal Husbandry – single, living in New York, completely convinced that I would never finish my book and that even if I did it would suck and never get published – writing was much more difficult than it is now. Back then, I would have to be in the mood to write, which, quite frankly, happened maybe once or twice a year. That meant all the rest of the time I’d have to get myself in the mood – I’d have to have cigarettes. I’d have to be sitting in a certain position. The planets would have to be aligned in a certain way. Needless to say, I didn’t write very much (but luckily when I did, I would write a lot and for long stretches of time).

 Now things are very different. I’m the breadwinner of the family and so writing has become what I do for a living, which makes doing it easier in certain fundamental aspects. It takes away all the emotional parts of writing that often get in the way – there is no room for being in the mood, or not feeling like it, or feeling like a giant loser or a shitty writer. I have to do it. So when I’m working on something – like a book, or an article – the minute my son goes to school and I come home, I’m working. And I work until he comes home. It’s that simple.

 Of course, there are plenty of times I’m not working – when I’m in between projects, or “thinking,” or busy with housework or bill-paying or dishwasher unloading or sock-drawer organizing – and on those days I don’t write at all. When you “work at home” that kind of includes all kinds of work. And some days the work doesn’t include writing.

Your third book (Her) was published in 2002, while your latest novel Piece of Work was first release in 2006. In what ways did you four-year hiatus mirror Julia’s?

You know, one of the things I learned during that time was that success isn’t permanent. I’d been very lucky with my first few books – generous advances had allowed me to take my time between books. But after HER was published I seemed to hit a rough patch. HER didn’t sell as well as we’d all hoped it would. I wrote a mystery that my publisher (and about 10 other publishers) didn’t want. I had to “break-up” with my long-term agent who had become a very close friend. Movie options were dropped and with them potential income was lost. Basically, I had to deal with a whole host of career dominos that could have fallen one way but ended up falling another. Lots of things went wrong and I found myself up to my eyeballs in failure – or, more correctly, in my sense of failure. Failure is relative, and so is success, and how we feel about where we are has almost everything to do with how we define each of those points. For me, I was less concerned with the narcissistic elements of my alleged failures and much more concerned with their tangible ramifications: as the breadwinner I become completely terrified that I was not going to be able to continue pulling off the magic hat trick of paying the mortgage while remaining a stay-at-home mother. When I started writing Piece of Work I was truly feeling like a has-been and so that idea really infused the book: Julia feels like a has-been who has to make a comeback as a publicist; Mary Ford is has-been desperate for a comeback to reclaim her fame; Peter, Julia’s husband, feels like a has been because he’s lost his job and can’t find another one. It sounds like such a cliché but life is full of ups and downs and we’re constantly in flux between the two states of being.

On your website you describe your novels as thinly disguised autobiographies? How does your family feel about the characters in your novels? Do they ever recognize themselves or do they argue that you’ve grossly misrepresented them? Or have you ever created a fictional character that someone misconstrued as themselves?

That’s a great question – my parents were actually disappointed to find out that they weren’t in Animal Husbandry. They’d spent all those years while I was writing it wondering how they would be portrayed – pretending to be nervous and scared at what I would say about them – and so I got the last laugh! They actually love being in the books – I described they’re ridiculous way it takes them 3 weeks to pack for a one week trip in Dating Big Bird, and then in Piece of Work I show them being themselves – Costco chickens and impromptu games of Jewish Geography and all. I also talk about Julia’s parents having lost a child and how that has affected their family and that is based on my family too: my parents lost their first child and its something cast a long shadow on their lives, and mine.

 As for my husband – he’s a very very good sport. I based Donald from HER on him in certain ways – he’s hilarious in a kind of out-there way – and I had a lot of fun with that character. Luckily, he saw the humor in it too.

In Piece of Work, you draw some parallels between managing a domestic environment and managing a business environment. What is the significance of this parallel for you?

No matter how difficult it is to manage a home situation – and I don’t even have it that bad since we have only one child as compared to other people with two or three or four – nothing compares to the stress of an office job for me. Maybe it was the job itself – I was a book publicist for 10 years at Random House in New York – that made me so crazy but to me that’s the worst possible stress situation. Give me 20 snacks and 40 lunches to make and I’ll take that any day over getting prepared for a marketing meeting. The only exception to this is playdates: having playdates at my house completely unhinge me.

On your blog you link to the website Work it, Mom! where co-founder Nataly Kogan posted a rant about the term “mompreneur”. She noted how no one calls male entrepreneurs “dadpreneurs.” I think Julia Einstein beautifully illustrates the conflicted feelings that many women are trying to resolve through new business models. Do you think there is a tendency for men to compartmentalize their roles while women long to integrate them? Why do think women feel so compelled to be all things at once? Do you think we can do it successfully?

I love that piece Nataly wrote because it’s so true – not just in the business world where she’s absolutely right that no one calls men in business who are dads “dadpreneurs” – but also in writing. No matter what I write now – if there’s a woman in it it gets slapped as either “chick lit” or “mommy lit.” Period. I’m not sure why this is and I feel like I’ve been a really good sport about the Chick Lit thing – people have a lot worse problems, I’ve always believed, then not loving the fact that their novels are categorized in a pejorative way – but now it’s getting a little annoying. I’d like to write a memoir about having moved home to where I grew up and what it’s like being at this point in life – 45, married, with a young child – but I just know with any kind of framing like that it will be thrown into the Mommy Lit pile and labeled accordingly. Women do, as you say, live their lives in a more integrated way – they multi-task without thinking while men do not. I think the only thing that gets us into trouble is thinking that we can do it all at the same time. We can’t. We can do a lot of things just not necessary all at once. So we should forgive ourselves for “failing.”

In your Washington Post article on The Writing Life: How to summon forth the Secret Author Person within you, you talk about repressing the desire to write in order to fit in with social expectations (i.e. a respectable career). Is that why you took the Radcliffe Publishing Procedures Course—to find a respectable job within the publishing industry? As a former insider, what can you tell us about industries perspective on “chic lit/mom lit”? What should women writing within this genre know?

I took the Radcliffe Publishing Course mainly because I truly didn’t know what I was going to do for work when I grew up. I knew I couldn’t work at IHOP for the rest of my life. But I couldn’t do math and sucked at standardized tests which meant that there was no way I could go to law school, much less make it through the LSAT. My parents, while supportive of my writing in general, were very discouraging about the idea that I would be able to earn a living doing it. They’d grown up in the Depression and to them the only acceptable way to approach life was with a job with benefits in hand. So I grew up believing that, too. I was not one of those brave people who started out taking a different route. I took the safest route I could – which meant trying to find a job in an industry that was interesting. And book publishing was perfect.

 As for the genre of “chick lit” or “mom lit” – all I can say is that instead of trying to write into a certain genre, you should write about what you feel passionately about. When I was writing Animal Husbandry, chick lit didn’t exist. It happened afterwards, when my book and a bunch of other books proved that a collective consciousness exists and at the time that collective consciousness was focused on single women who were trying to figure out their lives. “Mommy Lit’ is sort of an extension of this: the same single women who are now married with children are still trying to figure out their lives. The only thing to remember when writing is that you have to – have to – be passionately engaged in the world you’re writing about because writing a book takes a long time.

Have you started a new project? What is the initial writing phase like for you?

Speaking of failure: I wrote about 100 pages of a non-fiction book on failure – all the different ways we “fail” which actually lead to success – but, well, it failed to sell to a publisher. Which means I officially failed at failure. Luckily, I’m collaborating on a book with Patti Novak, star of the A&E reality show “Confessions of a Matchmaker” and real-life hilarious matchmaker from Buffalo, New York, and I’m really excited about it. There’s a big relief writing about someone else – telling someone else’s story — instead of my own. And now I have a partner instead of having to do it all by myself.

Book Review: Piece of Work

Zigman, Laura. Piece of Work. Grand Central Publishing. 304 p. ISBN: 9780446696005 (0446696005) $13.99

What a piece of work! Laura Zigman had me hooked from page one:

Piece of WorkIt was around ten-thirty that bright April morning and, as usual, Julia was allowing herself to be bossed around by a three-year-old. She liked to think of it as a choice since it gave her the option of maintaining a shred of dignity in the face of frequent humiliation and subjugation. Toddlers, she remembered hearing someone say, were like big tyrants of tiny countries . . .

Mom’s everywhere will relate to Julia’s bitter sweet joy of underappreciated servitude. Zigman’s humor is a salve for wounded female egos. Like many modern women, Julia Einstein left a flourishing career to stay at home and raise her child, but when her husband’s unemployment forces her back to work, Julia is faced with heartbreak and resentment.

In “Piece of Work,” Zigman captures the reality of contemporary motherhood. Torn between the love for her son and the need to provide for her family, Julia is forced to accept a job she would have considered a demotion three years earlier. The business world is unforgiving and a three year hiatus has cooled her résumé, but juggling the responsibilities of housework and childcare has kept her sharp.

Re-entering the world of public relations, Julia soon discovers that dealing with the self-centered ego of a toddler bares a striking resemblance to ‘has been’ celebrities. Stuck with a difficult client, Julia desperately tries to balance her personal life and work responsibilities.

Piece of Work is fast paced and entertaining, while maintaining the poignant emotions that women will relate to. Zigman has created a multi-faceted lead character that represents the very essence of womanhood. Julia Einstein is a complex mix of confidence and insecurities that is touching and familiar. Zigman beautifully captures the tension between a woman’s need to assert herself as an individual and the longing to connect with others.

The skill with which Zigman captures the everyday reality of a three-year-old is astounding, and the relationship between mother and child is so convincing that I feel like the author has been spying on me.

Thematically, Zigman does a superb job of illustrating the shifting realities of women. Career women, who choose to stay home and raise children, do not fall into a black abyss of non-existence, but merely step into an alternate existence. Many women (taking their cue from employers) often underestimate their value when re-entering the work force. Zigman draws a parallel between domestic and business responsibilities, with the transference of skills moving in both directions.

Zigman also manages to address these issues without being heavy handed. Piece of Work will pull you in with its snarky drama and endear you with its sharp wit. It’s a story that will be hard to put down and harder to forget.

Author Interview: Robin Gerber

Yesterday, I posted the review of a fabulous new book Eleanor Vs. Ike by Robin Gerber. If you missed the review, I highly encourage you to check it out. In my opinion, Eleanor Vs. Ike is a must read for every registered voter.  Gerber’s credentials are extensive, with over fifteen years of experience on Capitol Hill as a committee staffer, a chief lobbyist and a political director.

Currently, Ms. Gerber is a lawyer, senior faculty for the Gallup Organization, and senior fellow at the University of Maryland. (And I thought I was a multi-tasker!) Gerber is also an experienced writer. Gerber pens one of the most popular columns for Reader’s Digest, “You Be the Judge,” as well as opinion pieces that frequently appear in national newspapers. Gerber also authored the non-fiction titles Leadership the Eleanor Roosevelt Way: Timeless Strategies from the First Lady of Courage and Katherine Graham: The Leadership Journey of an American Icon. 

Over the New Year’s Holiday, Ms. Gerber was kind enough to answer a few questions for us here at Modern Matriarch. In the following interview, she talks about her novel, addresses current political issues, and shares the joys and challenges of writing both fiction and non-fiction. I hope you enjoy meeting Robin Gerber as much as I did. 

Eleanor Vs. Ike is a fascinating work of fiction that imaginatively foreshadows the political race of 2008. The fictional campaign revolves around the real foreign and domestic issues that dominated the 1952 election. How do those issues parallel those faced by the current presidential candidates?  

The similarities between 1952 and 2008 are truly striking. In 1952, the United States was mired in an unpopular war in Korea that the Democratic President, Harry Truman, had gotten into with dubious support from Congress. The candidates had vigorous arguments over disentangling from Korea, which was as un-winnable a situation for the U.S. then as Iraq is for us now. Truman, like President Bush, was extremely unpopular, not only because of the war but because of scandals in his administration. Truman chose not to run for reelection, but like President Bush, his unpopular legacy was a detriment to his party. Most shocking, perhaps, is that President Truman had failed in his effort to get universal health care so that, like today, it was part of the candidates’ debate.  Finally, just as today’s candidates talk about how they would deal with terrorism, the candidates in 1952 had to reassure voters that they had a plan for dealing with the threat of Communism. 

If nominated for the Democratic ticket, which issues will prove the most troublesome for Hillary Clinton? 

The war in Iraq, and the possibility of armed engagement with other countries like Iran are a potential Achilles heel for Hillary Clinton. Even though she serves on the Senate Armed Services, and met over eighty foreign leaders as First Lady, stereotypes about women being poor military leaders will persist. Hopefully, Senator Clinton, like Great Britain’s Margaret Thatcher, can successfully overcome the idea that a woman can’t be  strong on defense. 

In your novel, the struggle for Civil Rights plays a big role in Eleanor’s campaign for the presidency, unifying the African American community and a mobilized force of Woman voters. What are the chances of us seeing a Clinton-Obama democratic ticket in 2008? Do you think this will help or hurt the candidates? 

It’s quite amazing and encouraging that we could even be talking about such a ticket! I’m sure Eleanor would be pleased if she were around. In political terms, however, Clinton picking Obama as a running mate wouldn’t make good sense. Democrats are already highly energized in 2008, and African Americans historically vote Democratic in overwhelming numbers. To the extent that a Vice-President generates votes for the ticket, which is questionable, it’s more likely that Clinton would pick a Latino running mate. Someone like New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson, who is currently running for President, would be a good candidate to energize the large Latino vote for Democrats.

In the novel, the issue of voting for a candidate solely based on gender is a major consideration. Do you think contemporary voters are more or less likely to vote based on gender?

I’d like to say that the gender issue is completely in the past, but it’s not. Of course, there is less sex discrimination than in 1952, but on the simple questions, “Would you be willing to vote for a female President?” we still don’t get 100% of voters saying ‘yes’ as they would for a male. We’re also seen that women are supporting Clinton much more strongly than men. I think there are enough voters willing to vote based on qualifications rather than “hair, hemlines and husbands” to elect Clinton, but I’m looking forward to the day when gender isn’t a consideration at all.

Eleanor Roosevelt wrote the daily syndicated column ‘My Day’ from 1935-1962, which you mention in your book, expressing her views on current social and political issues. (I guess that makes her one of the first women “bloggers.”) Her column has an authenticity that we don’t see in the polished sound bites and press releases of modern politicians. With the dominance of carefully crafted political messages, it seems odd to me that Hillary Clinton is the only candidate voters suspect will capitulate to the polls.  Why do you think this is?

Women leaders face a double-bind. If they exhibit the qualities we say we want in leaders: being strong, assertive, take charge and dominant, they aren’t liked or trusted. Research shows this double-bind exists in every sector from politics to business to the military. And Eleanor Roosevelt faced it too. She was vilified every time she tried to lead on an issue, like when she proposed the creation of the National Youth Administration during the Depression. She was so roundly criticized so often that she coined this phrase which Clinton frequently uses, “You have to get skin as thick as a rhinoceros hide.”   

On more than one occasion in the novel, Eleanor Roosevelt pulls a letter out of her purse and reads it from the speaker’s podium. This struck me as very symbolic because a woman’s purse is often viewed as frivolous fashion rather than utilitarian (like a briefcase). Eleanor’s habit of setting hers on the podium seems to draw attention to her femininity, while quoting from a letter seems to draw attention to the first acceptable form of feminine writing. Is any of this symbolism intentional or was this behavior drawn from historical fact? 

I love your interpretation, but I have to confess that she did carry a purse. And although she never used notes for her speeches, she did have what I would call “affirmations” in her bag. I think it’s wonderful, and clearly was a comfort to her. 

In the novel, General Eisenhower’s political advisors first characterize Eleanor as a “grandmother” in order to make her seem less potent as a political figure. The term not only makes her sound old and archaic, it also strips away her sexuality. Do you think there’s still an unspoken assumption that a woman’s true value is based on her ability to conceive and rear children?  

I think that was truer in 1952 when far fewer women were in the workplace and families were in a post-war baby boom.  There was a great acceptance that a woman’s place was in the home in the 1950’s. The women’s movement of the 1960’s, and books like Betty Friedan’s, “The Feminine Mystique,” began to change traditional views of women’s roles. Today, more than seventy percent of mothers work full or part-time and there’s much greater acceptance of the idea that women have value in many roles, as do men.  

In the author interview included at the back of the book, you mention how much you enjoyed writing this, your first work of fiction. You also allude to the huge learning curve that took place. Can you tell us more about that? How is the process of writing non-fiction different from writing fiction? 

In nonfiction I’m taking information and trying to organize and relate it in the most interesting way, but I don’t make anything up. With “Eleanor vs. Ike” I was able to play with real events, like Nixon’s Checker’s speech, and ask myself, “what would Eleanor have done?” Since she didn’t actually run for President, I was able to make up the answer, build the scenes, plug in fun facts like FDR’s Fala speech and move the story along. The process had a puzzle-like quality because I knew the ending, but wasn’t sure how to get there in a way that would be suspenseful and believable. Being freed of the worry of not making a factual mistake, which is always hovering over you in nonfiction, was very exhilarating. I also had to learn to write dialog, which I’d never done, and build “color” into the scenes. Luckily, I had a wonderful editor who helped me! 

Gerber’s novel Eleanor Vs. Ike will go on sale next Tuesday, January 8th.  For more information visit website at www.robingerber.com. Gerber also maintains a blog in the voice of Eleanor Roosevelt at http://robingerber.wordpress.com.

Book Review: Eleanor Vs. Ike

Gerber, Robin. Eleanor Vs. Ike. Avon A. 352 p. ISBN: 9780061373213. (ISBN10: 0061373214) On Sale; 1/8/2008

Eleanor Vs. IkeThe Iowa caucus takes place tomorrow, and the nation is a buzz with politics. In eleven short months we Americans will vote for the next President of the United States. With candidates like Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, it could be a very historic event.

From George Washington to George Bush, forty-three citizens have had the awesome privilege of serving in the highest political office of our nation. Although you may not know all forty-three presidents by name, one thing is certain. They’re all men. Why?

Washington insider, Robin Gerber, tackles that very issue in her new historical ‘what if’ Eleanor Vs. Ike. An expert on politics and women’s leadership, Gerber crafts an ingenious novel about the presidential campaign of former First Lady Eleanor Roosevelt.

Eleanor Vs. Ike envisions a world in which the Democratic party actually nominates a female candidate for the President of the United States—in 1952. The election quickly becomes an iconic clash between Mrs. Franklin D. Roosevelt and the World War II General Dwight David Eisenhower, informally known as Ike.

In her run for president, Eleanor must navigate the tough foreign and domestic issues of her time: the unpopular war in Korea, the homeland security issues of communism, the demand for better health care, and growing racial tension. Then of course, there is the other issue: gender. Like any presidential campaign, Gerber’s historical fiction is laced with the scandal and innuendo that feeds political maneuvering.

In Eleanor Vs. Ike, Robin Gerber weaves a plot-twisting imagination with historically grounded facts to create a page turning novel and an entertaining civics lesson. Her premise is plausible and her characters feel authentic. This book is more than just a good read; it’s a catalyst for needed conversations. Why hasn’t a woman been nominated for the presidential candidacy? When will the country be ready to elect a woman for Commander in Chief? Do short term goals always trump long term goals in politics? As women, what is our political responsibility?

Gerber’s clear voice and bold vision makes Eleanor Vs. Ike a novel every registered voter should read.

Why Resolutions Fail Year After Year

janus.jpg

Today we stand in a doorway. Today is not only the first day of January, a month named after the Roman god Janus, it’s the first day of a new year.

Janus was the god of gates and doorways, beginnings and endings. With two faces, one facing forward and one facing behind, Janus can see both the past and the future, and is often used as a symbol of transition.

What better time for resolutions. But if a new year’s resolution is a commitment to a lifestyle change, why do so many people make the same resolutions year after year? Because—what many call resolutions are often little more than goals. With a little persistence, a goal can be achieved. Achieving a goal requires little more than identifying an outcome and creating small actionable steps.

Even if you happen to achieve the goals you set for yourself, how likely are you to maintain the outcome. Whether your goal is to loose weight, stick to a budget, or get better organized, it’s not really a resolution unless it’s accompanied by a true paradigm shift.

A paradigm is a set of beliefs and values. A paradigm shift is that “ah-ha” moment when your beliefs and values are instantly altered. An “ah-ha moment doesn’t just happen, though. It is up to you to initiate that experience. You must expose yourself to new and diverse ideas. You must be willing to let go of old ways of being and embrace new ones.

A resolution is not a goal, but a transition. Like the two faced Janus, a true resolution is an apex, where the end of one thing meets the beginning of another. With a true resolution we step over a threshold from the past into the future.